Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 262 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 28 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10940X - 137 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $291.75 vs $570.32
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10940X - $2.36 vs $4.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €633.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15377 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€323.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15377 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 12 |
28 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |