Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than FX-6350 - 263 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 28 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - $73.11 vs $493.56
- Up to 83% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-10940X - $0.36 vs $2.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
17.307692307692307%
Price, €
€547.85
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €547.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
224
85.17110266159695%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |