Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Ryzen 7 2700X - 203 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $153.55 vs $584.23
- Up to 73% better value when playing Control than Core i9-10920X - $0.85 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 105 vs 165 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
26%
Price, €
€648.49
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €648.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18116 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€170.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |