Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 7% better in World of Tanks than FX-8350 - 542 vs 505 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $135.27 vs $584.23
- Up to 75% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10920X - $0.3 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 125 vs 165 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
25%
Price, €
€648.49
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €648.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |