Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2696 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3470 - 190 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $50.43 vs $413.13
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 77 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Buy for €55.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
39.46700507614213%
Multi-Core
1840
19.63504428556184%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |