Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900X is 414 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 356 vs 347 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $449.68 vs $786.04
- Up to 44% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $1.4 vs $2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
356
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€499.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €499.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for €872.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |