Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $413.13 vs $599.06
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74161 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
121
97.58064516129032%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€664.96
68%
Buy for €664.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
74.30203045685279%
Multi-Core
7539
80.45032547220147%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |