Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Borderlands 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 224 vs 216 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $171.83 vs $413.13
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
216
96.42857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€190.73
100%
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
74.49238578680203%
Multi-Core
6976
74.44242876960837%
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |