Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 104 days older than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - 135 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $145.5 vs $449.68
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - $1.2 vs $3.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €499.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |