Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 32 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Resident Evil 4 than Athlon 3000G - 182 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $38.75 vs $449.68
- Up to 91% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-10900X - $0.26 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €499.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
167
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Athlon |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |