Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF and the more expensive Core i9-10900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900 - 64 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $190.11 vs $201.79
- Up to 7% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900 - $3.3 vs $3.56 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
64
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€211.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18750 minutes ago
Buy for €223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |