Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $182.06 vs $592.26
- Up to 70% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.49 vs $4.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 32 vs 20 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3201 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
134
98%
Value, €/FPS
€4.91/FPS
30%
Price, €
€657.41
30%
Buy for €657.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |