Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 7% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-4670 - 259 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $43.86 vs $358.28
- Up to 87% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-10900K - $0.2 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
12.987012987012989%
Price, €
€397.69
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €397.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1558 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
242
93.43629343629344%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
67.00971983990853%
Multi-Core
3228
35.22863690930918%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |