Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-3470 - 119 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $50.43 vs $416.75
- Up to 87% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-10900K - $0.51 vs $3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.89/FPS
13%
Price, €
€462.59
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €462.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12133 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
110
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |