Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $314.41 vs $658.06
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-12400F - $0.58 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900K - 659 vs 602 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
602
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€349
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
659
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
52%
Price, €
€730.45
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |