Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Core i9-7920X - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $178.41 vs $400.11
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-7920X - $1.29 vs $2.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €198.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for €444.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |