Buy on Amazon
€211.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-9700 - 125 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $182.99 vs $190.11
- Up to 3% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900F - $1.64 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
97%
Price, €
€211.02
96%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
124
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€203.12
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €203.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.