Buy on Amazon
€176.93
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1039 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-7820X - 229 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $159.4 vs $328.3
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for €176.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75190 minutes ago
Intel Core i7 i7-7820X Octa-core 8 Core 3.60 GHz Processor Socket R4 LGA-2066
Buy for €364.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Single-Core
1411
84.18854415274463%
Multi-Core
7849
93.15214811298362%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.