Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Core i7-7700 - 185 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $122.11 vs $178.41
- Up to 31% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900F - $0.74 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
69%
Price, €
€198.04
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €198.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€135.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €135.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |