Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-7600 - 167 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $70.17 vs $182.8
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-10900F - $0.48 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
39%
Price, €
€202.91
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
161
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |