Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i9-10900F - 215 vs 205 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $122.48 vs $162.76
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €180.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for €135.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
76.32058287795994%
Multi-Core
8426
96.77271161134719%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |