Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-3220 - 136 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $67.25 vs $159.38
- Up to 47% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i9-10900F - $0.69 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
53%
Price, €
€176.91
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €176.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10439 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
108
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |