Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 75 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $180.59 vs $690.95
- Up to 74% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $1.25 vs $4.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.76/FPS
26%
Price, €
€766.95
26%
Buy for €766.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |