Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 626 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 207 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $180.59 vs $511.83
- Up to 68% better value when playing Rust than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $0.97 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 64 vs 20 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €200.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
185
89%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
31%
Price, €
€568.13
35%
Buy for €568.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
20 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |