Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 7 2700X - 542 vs 528 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $145.5 vs $190.11
- Up to 21% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - $0.31 vs $0.39 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
79%
Price, €
€211.02
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
528
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €161.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |