Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 3 3100 - 240 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $146.16 vs $175.49
- Up to 11% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i9-10900F - $0.72 vs $0.81 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
88%
Price, €
€194.79
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €194.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
225
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €162.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |