Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-8150 - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $59.97 vs $163.05
- Up to 61% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900F - $0.57 vs $1.45 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
39.3103448275862%
Price, €
€180.98
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
116
92.80000000000001%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |