Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9600KF - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $131.7 vs $200.16
- Up to 33% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900 - $1.33 vs $1.98 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
67%
Price, €
€222.18
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €222.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |