Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Celeron G4900 - 63 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $39.15 vs $318.06
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76751 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.15023474178404%
Multi-Core
1051
12.480703004393776%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |