Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1260 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $204.0 vs $386.79
- Up to 41% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - $1.81 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10850K - 140 vs 125 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
125
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
58%
Price, €
€429.34
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €429.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |