Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 88 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700F - 182 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $165.23 vs $204.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10850K - $1.02 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.24/FPS
82%
Price, €
€226.44
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10270 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10270 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |