Buy on Amazon
€227.25
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 1791 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - 137 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $29.18 vs $204.73
- Up to 83% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - $0.25 vs $1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 51 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.49/FPS
16.778523489932887%
Price, €
€227.25
14%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-10850K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
86.86131386861314%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10850K
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
33.39080459770115%
Multi-Core
992
10.90589270008795%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.