Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2793 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1610 - 269 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $27.05 vs $204.73
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €227.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
24.482758620689655%
Multi-Core
739
8.124450307827615%
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |