Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 830 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 7% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 5 2600 - 276 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $102.37 vs $190.11
- Up to 42% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-10850K - $0.44 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
57%
Price, €
€211.02
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8136 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
259
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |