Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3211 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 17% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6100 - 182 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $21.68 vs $197.42
- Up to 88% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10850K - $0.15 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 95 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.2/FPS
12.5%
Price, €
€219.14
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
156
85.71428571428571%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10850K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |