Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-980X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-980X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 3139 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-980X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-980X
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - $108.23 vs $291.75
- Up to 55% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9900K - $1.09 vs $2.42 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-980X - 134 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-980X - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-980X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-980X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
FPS
110
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €120.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.42/FPS
45%
Price, €
€323.84
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-980X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Gulftown | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |