Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9800X outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9800X is 851 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9800X
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 58 vs 55 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $257.64 vs $562.2
- Up to 52% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-9800X - $5.2 vs $10.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.76/FPS
48.3271375464684%
Price, €
€624.04
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €624.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
55
94.82758620689656%
Value, €/FPS
€5.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€285.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €285.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1173
85.74561403508771%
Multi-Core
6726
91.47286821705426%
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |