Buy on Amazon
€624.04
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9800X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9800X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Core i7-9800X - 237 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-9800X - $175.48 vs $562.2
- Up to 70% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-9800X - $0.82 vs $2.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-9800X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
226
95.35864978902954%
Value, €/FPS
€2.76/FPS
29.71014492753623%
Price, €
€624.04
31%
Intel Core i7-9800X X-Series Processor 8 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC3)
Buy for €624.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1618 minutes ago
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€194.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €194.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9800X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1368
63.012436665131276%
Multi-Core
7353
80.1766437684004%
Intel Core i7-9800X | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.