Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1439 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-5675C - 131 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $90.74 vs $204.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i7-9700F - $0.8 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.73/FPS
46%
Price, €
€226.44
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
126
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |