Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 373 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i5-10400 - 203 vs 201 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $92.01 vs $204.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-9700F - $0.51 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
45%
Price, €
€226.44
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €102.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |