Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4160 - 188 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $14.62 vs $190.11
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-9700F - $0.1 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
8.928571428571429%
Price, €
€211.02
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
165
87.7659574468085%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
68.68947708198839%
Multi-Core
2072
33.12020460358056%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |