Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 385 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G4900 - 177 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $39.15 vs $199.62
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €221.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76376 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
39.76759199483538%
Multi-Core
1051
16.79987212276215%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |