Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 202 days older than the cheaper Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $204.0 vs $498.74
- Up to 59% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $1.07 vs $2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-9700F - 213 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
212
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
41%
Price, €
€553.6
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €553.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |