Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 621 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $1.69 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $197.42 vs $204.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€226.44
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 210 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
128
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
98%
Price, €
€219.14
100%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |