Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 1600 - 61 vs 53 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $87.75 vs $199.62
- Up to 49% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-9700F - $1.84 vs $3.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €221.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 335 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |