Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 1400 - 240 vs 221 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $69.47 vs $190.11
- Up to 60% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-9700F - $0.35 vs $0.88 per FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
240
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
39.77272727272727%
Price, €
€211.02
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
221
92.08333333333333%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
949
61.26533247256294%
Multi-Core
3098
49.52046035805627%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |