Buy on Amazon
€182.61
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G1620 - 165 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $35.83 vs $164.51
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €182.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 303 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.