Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 621 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 207 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $182.99 vs $197.42
- Up to 10% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.98 vs $1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€203.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €203.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
201
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
89%
Price, €
€219.14
92%
Buy for €219.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |