Buy on Amazon
€197.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 229 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Athlon 200GE - 314 vs 302 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $51.17 vs $177.86
- Up to 70% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-9700 - $0.19 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Intel Core i7-9700 Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.7 GHz LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for €197.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Athlon |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.