Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-960 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-960 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 446 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-960.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-960
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $158.68 vs $329.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-2500K - $1.22 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-960 - 147 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i7-960 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-960 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
FPS
144
97.95918367346938%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €176.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6399 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.48/FPS
49.193548387096776%
Price, €
€365.19
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €365.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 20th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-960 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |